Edenderry Impact

True Red · Post by **True Red** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:19 pm

See what happens when the Red's get relegated.......unleash the fury

http://www.gaelsport.com/html/clubadmin ... gh_Hit.mpg

Lone Shark · Post by **Lone Shark** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:23 pm

Incidentally, that does bring up another issue which is a little bugbear of mine.

The only legal contact tackle in Gaelic Football is the shoulder to shoulder charge - yet this is a perfect example of when you do it well enough to knock the other guy over, you get whistled?

I personally believe football would be a lot better game if the likes of this was allowed, because it would give defenders a legitimate tool to use to unbalance a guy without sly little pulls and drags as have become the norm.

Bord na Mona man · Post by **Bord na Mona man** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:41 pm

Player(s) may tackle an opponent for the ball.
Provided that he has at least one foot on the ground,
a player may make a side-to-side charge on an opponent-
(a) who is in possession of the ball, or
(b) who is playing the ball, or
(c) when both players are moving in the direction of the ball to play it.

It all depends on how liberally you interpret Point C.
Was the incoming man strictly moving in the direction of the ball?
He was initially, but wasn't as the tackle was being executed.

True Red · Post by **True Red** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:13 pm

If you slow it down the tackle wasnt necessarily shoulder to shoulder.it starts there but ends up hitting him in the chest. I can see how the ref gave a free in this instance.

A great hit either way.

Ron · Post by **Ron** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:21 pm

It could also be the case that that kind of tackle could be deemed "dangerous play" by the referee. Those kind of tackles don't generally hurt that much as long as the tackled player can see it coming.

Sydthebeat · Post by **Sydthebeat** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:58 pm

(c) when both players are moving in the direction of the ball to play it.

i didnt see anything in that tackle to suggest the tackler was attempting to play the ball... if anything its clearly apparent hes playing the man....

Lone Shark · Post by **Lone Shark** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:23 pm

I suppose it is tricky to tell off a view like that if your man had the hit lined up from way back or whether he was moving towards the ball while the ball was moving perpendicular, if you follow my drift.

Perhaps I'm acting like an old man reminiscing for once-upon-a-time stuff, but the overall point stands though. All too often I've seen a shoulder charge executed so well that it knocks the other guy off his feet and as a result the ref gives a free.

True Red · Post by **True Red** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:47 pm

It is a shoulder that harks back to a bygone age and he probably wouldnt have been whistled for it 20 years ago.
Just to show that the same player can have an equally destructive impact with the ball in his hands....

http://www.gaelsport.com/html/clubadmin ... 20Goal.mpg

naasmanxrhode · Post by **naasmanxrhode** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:02 pm

Lads, at the end of the day this is just an intermediate match

DD · Post by DD » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:12 pm

naasmanxrhode wrote:Boys, at the end of the day this is just an intermediate game.

Even when we're shite, yer still bitter..You take the man out of Rhode...but you can't take Rhode out of the man..

True Red · Post by **True Red** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:21 pm

Think DD's response answers that statement perfectly.

Hyper · Post by **Hyper** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:26 pm

Did he drop that ball or was it hopped twice!!! Was that Martin Keogh scoring?

True Red · Post by **True Red** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:41 pm

Thats him alright.Think he soloed it but didnt catch it and then hopped it after that.Think thats allowed?

Hyper · Post by **Hyper** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:45 pm

Would be a good man with the hurl in the hand and executing that shoulder!!!

Kevin · Post by **Kevin** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:38 pm

Agree w Sydthebeat. Looks like the 'hitter' is not playing the ball.