This could lead to chaos, and that's without a draw/replay scenario or a postponement.
This is what bugs me about 'GAA think'. Now, the GAA has lots of problems, but too often the thinking is that any alternative must be better than what we have at the moment. This isn't necessarily so. In this instance a proposal has been worked out (and I accept there are people who have put alot of work into formulating a solution and I do thank them) and the herd have generally gone with the alternative.
Moreso in football there seems to be a 'heirarchy' of top teams, being - Rhode, Clara, Tullamore, Edenderry in that order. But, surely it's not up to the Board to attempt to break such heirarchys by changing the championship system. At what stage do they change the hurling system in order to put a stop to Kilcormac-KIlloughey's gallop?
Lone Shark wrote: 5/10 - SF's SFC
12/10 - SF's SHC
19/10 - F SFC
26/10 - F SHC
Now there are a lot of problems there from what I can tell - you have the hurlers one game in early May and their second in late July, you have dual players bouncing between codes without any rest, and if you get so much as one postponement, either for a club bereavement, a draw, freak weather (we are going right into late October here) then you have a situation where either or SFC football or hurling winners would have to play two games in a weekend, as happened in Clare this year - unless they get a first round bye.
Now imagine our hurlers beat Kilkenny in the championship, or the U21 hurlers win a game, or either senior team reaches either a provincial final or an All Ireland quarter final - not likely admittedly, but hardly impossible either. This system only barely works if none of our county teams achieve anything meaningful.
And after all this, I can't for the life of me see what the positive aspects are - can anyone enlighten me?